The Left is about sharing , The Right about justified greed

Simple enough isn't it.
Too simple. Far too simple!
The left has moved from being an independent intellectual force to just being a government force . It can no longer survive without the drip feed of government funding. The collection plate is not passed around each week to keep the church going . The left is now a tax payer funded church .Worse ,we all go there whether we agree or not because they live in the ABC .Obama's inability in America to control the growth of the PS is the same imperative that drives Greenlabor- the imperative of  State Church .Worse, the reality that the left hasn't got enough oommmff to drive itself on idealism alone means it has no option but to remain parasitical and reactionary . Lindsay Tanner is right about the lack of soul in the Party . The tragedy for taxpayers is that a State church seat is now just too comfortable for those seated there. Most on the left don't seems to know where to find any soul music and worse.,  they are not out there looking . Church is a great place to go to sleep . Certainly many in leadership have no idea. It's all become "the other blokes problem".

Knowing how ineffective some of its doctrines and nanny like imperatives are,  how can it survive ? Is  robbing the rich to feed the poor a sophisticated enough idea to work miracles in our age? Even a child can see that such" take it off one to give to another" is crude , unjust, dumb and in long term ineffective for discipline and growth.  The left only survives now by giving itself a job in church , inhouse, in governance . The left no longer lives in the real world but in the corridors of power . No longer an outside job,  its an INSIDERS job.
The  widespread ineffective control of human services,  education and even environment is obvious to those who send their kids to other church schools and who see where the money we are forced to give them give goes. Infact,  the ineffectiveness of their political action doctrines is driving them to act a little fanatical.

The right are still as prone to be as arrogant as ever . Our society has been been  built on the words of a real radical,  but you would never know that listening to many of the comfort zone characters who appear on the rights stage . Its all quite simple: "If  do what I say , you will all be as rich as I am"  .I could go on, but why bother .The right are right -- aren't they?
 IPA and Miners are wealthy enough come in to tell us how they can look after the environment but farmers have NEVER been in that situation yet they look after the environment every day - no wonder the independents are sick of the also sleep prone right.
That the earth is kind to itself is something they know and could teach us ,but oh no the city knows better;  the screw you jacks won't let any of us rest . Up the revolution I say .

Both parties need to go back to their roots -recognise what made them really radical in the first place .
Both parties have forgotten how things work, and why things have worked a lot better in the past .

What in the world is soul ?

Tanner got to the heart of things last week .( He said the Labor party lacked soul)  The substance of his claim is established  by the numbers of open gaping mouths and the denial -and the cartoons on Insights ABC. Naturally its the group that loves rationality that finds itself out at sea with Machiavelli when the crunch comes.If you want to be really involved with the big picture ,you gotta think laterally or you will get lost.
Greenlabor think they are responsible for bringing the Kingdom of God on earth. They will need more than good luck, let alone their singularly myopic(automatic chair lifts?) view of direct routes  to heaven .Fine if they are serious,  but do they really think they have that sort of gift set?. More realistic soulful persons know that to change the world is to challenge the world - deeply and individually .Its all very well to join a rally to change the power structure- that's easy. The protest rally ends  only to be worse off from those who use the opportunity to grab the chance to gain it for themselves .
The real problem for all parties who claim to be god is that the idea cuts deep into the area of false confidence and false competence. Greenlabor think that it is enough to support the poor when it is not ;Jesus himself said the poor would always be there.; Who then is the more realistic ? Trying  to even up the balance is clearly a way to destroy the balance - after all its taxpayers who are obliged to pay !. Greenlabors preoccupation with equity is in denial of its failure to respect diversity in both nature and ecopractice . The way they "go on" ( on and on ) about supporting the poor  shows how little soul they have.- you don't respect the poor by propping them up, but by encouraging them in the way all good liberals do - encourage them in their own niches of productivity and "letting them speak for themselves"( most important) .
 News to you - it should not be ! Caring is not easy,  but it is cutting edge
Unfortunately its all news to most in Greenlabor , which only makes Tanners point very telling. And I haven't said much because its easy to hype up a soulful impression when you need one. You'll notice I haven't said about the nature of soul - not my intention to - just to draw attention like Tanner,  to the lack of it . Our point might be that you need to know it ,not just to name it to be credible on the subject  .Its something that comes from putting your own skills in perspective . It's not something you buy or put into your budget estimates for . Some dummies think its just about the past when its real power is being able to be prophetic. If you dare to abandon being reactionary ,popular and sheeplike and you will find you have some hope of gaining your perspective . Soul comes from deep within and  that's where the problem lies.